🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense controversy over their future often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the people who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government prevented the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the federal government pays for the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered personally.

Burgess spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and unique traits in their personalities. She developed a particular love for two female belugas with different personalities.

“One whale chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both transformed the way I understand bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her time at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility attributes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not open to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with pieces in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and constant attention than any human in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility thought particulars of the death were disclosed to the news outlets and she was released soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “considerable personnel”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In late September, Canada’s fisheries minister turned down a bid to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the application would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reflect a broader misunderstanding of the realities of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers struggle to find a solution, proposals have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of food for Inuit communities.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of Nova Scotia, which has received regulatory clearance, has proven most controversial. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the idea of a protected habitat indicates a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a viable solution in the coming months.

An official, head of the plan, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|